Blog
Retroactive Application Of The Hand And Foot Bill In New Jersey Worker’s Compensation
Section 12 of the New Jersey Workers Compensation Act (N.J.S.A. 34:15-12) was amended in 2020 to increase the schedule of permanent disability benefits for bodily injuries to the hands and feet. The purpose of the amendments was to address a long-standing perception that those workers suffering injuries to the hands…
Read More >Temporary Disability Issues & The Potential Impact Of The Corona Virus State Of Emergency In New Jersey
The State of New Jersey is a wage loss State for the purposes of workers’ compensation benefits. The benefit is meant to compensate the Petitioner for his/her lost weekly wages while they are unable to perform their job duties as a result of a workplace injury that has been admitted…
Read More >The Legalization Of Recreational Marijuana And What Employers Need To Know Now
On February 22, 2021, Governor Murphy signed three bills into law legalizing adult-use of cannabis and decriminalizing marijuana possession in New Jersey. The first, the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance and Marketplace Modernization Act (“CREAMMA”) removes cannabis as a Schedule I drug and legalizes personal cannabis use for adults…
Read More >Limits Imposed on Medical Provider Applications In New Jersey Worker’s Compensation
The Appellate Courts have issued guidance on jurisdictional issues raised by medical provider applications. The New Jersey Workers Compensation balances injured workers’ entitlement to treatment with the cost of that treatment by permitting medical providers to charge the “usual and customary” rate for procedures. Costs are controlled by permitting employers…
Read More >COVID-19 Pandemic and Impact on NJ Workers Compensation Claims
On May 12, 2020, the NJ Senate Labor Committee reported favorably on Bill S2380 designed to create a presumption of compensability for “essential employees” that contract COVID-19. The proposed legislation significantly impacts the NJ Workers Compensation Act by virtue of creating a presumption, albeit rebuttable, that an “essential employee” testing…
Read More >RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: UPDATED GUIDANCE FOR EMPLOYERS
LAST UPDATED: March 30, 2020 The following is an update on the latest State and Federal legislative enactments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These enactments have created new employee entitlements to leave and compensation in a variety of COVID-19 related circumstances. We encourage all employers to review Brown &…
Read More >RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: UPDATED GUIDANCE FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYERS
LAST UPDATED: March 22, 2020 In response to the public health emergency caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic (“COVID-19”), we are providing this update for public entities on the current status of actions by Federal, State and County officials. As you know, a state of emergency exists at all levels of…
Read More >RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: UPDATED GUIDANCE FOR PRIVATE EMPLOYERS
LAST UPDATED: March 22, 2020 In response to the public health emergency caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic (“COVID-19”), we are providing this update for private sector businesses and non-profits on the current status of actions by Federal, State and County officials. As you know, a state of emergency exists at…
Read More >Medical Providers Have Six Years to File Claims in the Division of Worker’s Compensation
On February 3, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division’s decision in The Plastic Surgery Center, PA v. Malouf Chevrolet-Cadillac, Inc. 457 N.J. Super 565 (App. Div. 2019) that the six-year statute of limitation for contract lawsuits, applies to claims brought by medical providers for payment of…
Read More >Medical Marijuana and Its Place in New Jersey Workers’ Compensation
In a case of first impression, the New Jersey Appellate Division addressed an employer’s obligation to reimburse an injured employee the costs associated with obtaining medicinal marijuana. In Hager v. M&K Construction, A-01012-18T3 (App. Div. January 13, 2010), the Appellate Court held there was no legislative or legal barrier to…
Read More >